<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Programming for Not-so-dummies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chickenwingsw.com/scratches/python/programming-for-not-so-dummies/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chickenwingsw.com/scratches/python/programming-for-not-so-dummies</link>
	<description>Developing ideas on developing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 05:03:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Eddie Sullivan</title>
		<link>http://www.chickenwingsw.com/scratches/python/programming-for-not-so-dummies/comment-page-1#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Eddie Sullivan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 14:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chickenwingsoftware.com/scratches/python/programming-for-not-so-dummies#comment-8</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;And maybe do away with compilers which output error messages, it promotes people to not check their code properly and depend on the compiler to find syntax errors.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m not sure if you&#039;re being sarcastic or serious. In any case, there is a difference between providing a tool to aid developers and limiting what developers can do in the name of &quot;safety.&quot; Perhaps this is a fine line. Some would argue that strict or static typing is too much artificial restriction. I certainly wouldn&#039;t go that far, since I believe anything that helps the programmer avoid errors without restricting what he can do is worthwhile.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>"And maybe do away with compilers which output error messages, it promotes people to not check their code properly and depend on the compiler to find syntax errors."</blockquote>

<p>I'm not sure if you're being sarcastic or serious. In any case, there is a difference between providing a tool to aid developers and limiting what developers can do in the name of "safety." Perhaps this is a fine line. Some would argue that strict or static typing is too much artificial restriction. I certainly wouldn't go that far, since I believe anything that helps the programmer avoid errors without restricting what he can do is worthwhile.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mayuresh Phadke</title>
		<link>http://www.chickenwingsw.com/scratches/python/programming-for-not-so-dummies/comment-page-1#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Mayuresh Phadke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 11:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chickenwingsoftware.com/scratches/python/programming-for-not-so-dummies#comment-7</guid>
		<description>And maybe do away with compilers which output error messages, it promotes people to not check their code properly and depend on the compiler to find syntax errors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[And maybe do away with compilers which output error messages, it promotes people to not check their code properly and depend on the compiler to find syntax errors.]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
