<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Chicken Scratches &#187; non-software</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chickenwingsw.com/scratches/category/non-software/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chickenwingsw.com</link>
	<description>Developing ideas on developing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 17:24:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s Wrong with Flying: How the internet killed travel</title>
		<link>http://www.chickenwingsw.com/scratches/programming/whats-wrong-with-flying</link>
		<comments>http://www.chickenwingsw.com/scratches/programming/whats-wrong-with-flying#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 17:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eddie Sullivan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[non-software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[airlines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expedia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[travel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chickenwingsoftware.com/scratches/?p=17</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Air travel is in a downward spiral. Not literally of course, but clearly and consistently, and everybody knows it. The airlines know it, the airline employees know it, travel agents found out a while ago, and consumers sure as Hell know it. There are a lot of reasons for it, but this post talks about just one: Expedia.com.

Airlines claim the degradation in quality comes from increased competition. They say they are forced to cut corners and reduce features in order to stay competitive. Does this make sense?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
  Air travel is in a downward spiral. Not literally of course, but
  clearly and consistently, and everybody knows it. The airlines know
  it, the airline employees know it, travel agents found out a while
  ago, and consumers sure as Hell know it. There are a lot of reasons
  for it, but this post talks about just one: Expedia.com.
</p>
<p>
  Airlines claim the degradation in quality comes from increased
competition. They say they are forced to cut corners and reduce
features in order to stay competitive. Does this make sense?
</p>
<span id="more-17"></span>
<p>
  <h4>What about other industries?</h4>
  Well, if it did make sense, we might expect to see a similar pattern
  in other industries. There is certainly vigorous competition in the
  auto industry. Car companies struggle to meet their profit
  margins. And yet, over the last twenty years, cars have gotten more
  reliable, full of more features, and more fuel-efficient, when you
  compare similar models. Competition has hurt the auto workers and
  the bottom lines of the auto companies, but it has made the product
  itself <em>better</em> for the consumer.
</p>
<p>
  Why has this not happened in the airline industry? Cars and flights
  are clearly two very different products, but what is the difference
  that accounts for this discrepancy? The main factor, I believe, is
  the way people make their purchases. When buying a car, a potential
  purchaser reads all the specs, he goes to the dealership and
  test-drives the car and kicks the tires. When the same person buys
  an airline ticket, he types the itinerary into Expedia.com (or
  Travelocity, or Orbitz) and gets a list of flights, ordered by
  price. He picks the cheapest ticket and steels himself for a
  miserable experience.
</p>
<p>
  "Well," contend the airlines, "people only care about the price of a
  flight, so we sacrifice the customer experience to meet the demand
  for lower prices." They now even resort to secret fees for checked
  bags, in-flight meals, even headphones to watch the movie. This is a
  sneaky trick to manipulate the search engines. Those extra fees do
  not show up in the results page. I challenge the assertion that
  consumers only care about price to the exclusion of other factors. I
  think the real problem is that price is the only piece of
  information they are given.
</p>
<h4>The proof of the pudding</h4>
<p>
  Try it. Go to expedia.com. Fill out the query form. Notice there is
  no field for the number of checked bags, there is no field for
  whether you will be having a meal, there is no field for whether you
  will want to watch the movie. These are important factors that you
  would want to take into account, but you are not given the
  opportunity.
</p>
<p>
  Now submit your search. You're presented with a list of flights,
  with the price in big black numbers and the flight schedule. That's
  it. No information about leg room, customer satisfaction, on-time
  performance, in-flight food and entertainment options, cancellation
  policies, or baggage handling. If you had this information, you
  would take it into account, but since you don't, you have no choice
  but to base your decision on price alone.
</p>
<p>
  When I go to Amazon.com to buy a fifteen dollar book, I can read
  four pages of user reviews telling me about the book. When buying a
  600 dollar cross-country flight, I don't see a single user
  review. There is nowhere for me to enter a review if I want to. The
  technology is here. It's everywhere. Everywhere except the airline
  search engines. Why?
  <h4>Why?</h4>
<p>
  Maybe the airlines are scared to let the consumers have a
  voice. Maybe they don't want user reviews, because the reviews would
  be overwhelmingly negative. If so, they are wrong. They're not wrong
  about the tone of the reviews; they would certainly be mostly
  negative, at least at first. They are wrong about the effect the
  reviews would have. In the long run, providing a way for consumers
  to compare flights and airlines based on more than just price will
  make flying a more pleasant experience for all. It will allow
  airlines to compete based on quality, not just price. And it's smart
  business.
</p>
<p>
  Expedia, Travelocity, and Orbitz are not going to change. They are
  the Big Three of flight searches. They are cleaning up while the
  airlines are suffering. There is <em>not enough
  competition</em>. The only way we will see an improvement is if
  somebody else steps in and offers us an alternative way to shop for
  flights. Google, are you listening? Amazon? Apple? Give us more
  information. Please.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chickenwingsw.com/scratches/programming/whats-wrong-with-flying/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This month&#8217;s Limerick contest: Basketball</title>
		<link>http://www.chickenwingsw.com/scratches/non-software/this-months-limerick-contest-basketball</link>
		<comments>http://www.chickenwingsw.com/scratches/non-software/this-months-limerick-contest-basketball#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 21:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eddie Sullivan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[non-software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chickenwingsoftware.com/scratches/?p=15</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
This month's contest over at limericks.chickenwingsoftware.com is Basketball: In this, the NBA playoff season, young man's fancy turns lightly to thoughts of hoops. Plus, the Celtics wear green!


A typical entry:


There once was a girl named Christine
Who had gotten the gambling gene
She said with some sadness,
"I lost at March Madness
Before it reached the sweet sixteen."



Sure, it's [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
This month's contest over at <a href="http://limericks.chickenwingsoftware.com">limericks.chickenwingsoftware.com</a> is Basketball: In this, the NBA playoff season, young man's fancy turns lightly to thoughts of hoops. Plus, the Celtics wear green!
</p>
<p>
A typical entry:
</p>

<pre>There once was a girl named Christine
Who had gotten the gambling gene
She said with some sadness,
"I lost at March Madness
Before it reached the sweet sixteen."
</pre>

<p>
Sure, it's no masterpiece, but it's fun. That's sort of the spirit of these contests. <a href="http://limericks.chickenwingsoftware.com">Head on over</a> to read more, rate them, or write your own.
</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chickenwingsw.com/scratches/non-software/this-months-limerick-contest-basketball/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Let the Limericks Flow</title>
		<link>http://www.chickenwingsw.com/scratches/python/let-the-limericks-flow</link>
		<comments>http://www.chickenwingsw.com/scratches/python/let-the-limericks-flow#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 19:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eddie Sullivan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[django]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[python]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[limericks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chickenwingsoftware.com/scratches/?p=11</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We've created an online contest
To see who can rhyme the bestest
So come to our site
And prove you can write
The limerick that rates the highest.


Sorry, that's what happens when you try to write a limerick after four hours of reading technical specification documents. If you think you can do better, come to our limerick contest website [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<pre>We've created an online contest
To see who can rhyme the bestest
So come to our site
And prove you can write
The limerick that rates the highest.
</pre>

<p>Sorry, that's what happens when you try to write a limerick after four hours of reading technical specification documents. If you think you can do better, come to our <a href="http://limericks.chickenwingsoftware.com">limerick contest website</a> and make an entry, read and rate other entries, and waste some time.</p>
<p>
For the developers, the contest site is hosted on Django with a MySQL backend.
</p>
<p>
There will be a new category of limerick writing contest every month. This month's theme is <strong>cheese</strong>. Enjoy!
</p>
<ul>
	<li><a href="http://limericks.chickenwingsoftware.com">Go to the limerick contest</a>.</li>
</ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chickenwingsw.com/scratches/python/let-the-limericks-flow/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s wrong with hotels</title>
		<link>http://www.chickenwingsw.com/scratches/non-software/whats-wrong-with-hotels</link>
		<comments>http://www.chickenwingsw.com/scratches/non-software/whats-wrong-with-hotels#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 14:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eddie Sullivan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[non-software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chickenwingsoftware.com/scratches/non-software/whats-wrong-with-hotels</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anybody who needs to stay in hotels often knows there are certain areas where they could all do better. I tend to look at everything with an eye towards what could be improved. Here are some random thoughts on how hotels could be better. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Anybody who needs to stay in hotels often knows there are certain areas where they could <em>all</em> do better. I tend to look at everything with an eye towards what could be improved. Here are some random thoughts on how hotels could be better.  Some of these ideas are a bit far-fetched, but hey, that's why I'm writing a weblog, not a manifesto.
<h4>More pricing logic</h4>
It sometimes seems like the cheaper a hotel is, the more services it provides. I've stayed in a broad range of hotels, from top of the line luxury suites to eight-cot-to-a-room hostels. Strangely, there are some areas where the lesser quality hotels actually do better. Why is it that when I pay $40 per night for a small family-run inn, there is personalized service and free wi-fi in every room, but in a hotel that charges $375 per night there is either no wi-fi available or it costs $20 extra? What are we actually getting for the higher price? Why do cheap hotels provide breakfast but expensive hotels don't? It's backwards.
<h4>Cleanliness</h4>
After seeing watching a news report about hotel cleanliness issues, I've been a little bit paranoid about sanitation in hotels. A couple idea:
<h5>Get rid of the carpet</h5>
Carpeted floors are notoriously hard to clean. I don't want to think about what kind of dirtiness people can leave on carpets that doesn't get picked up by a vacuum cleaner. Get rid of the carpeted floor. Replace it with hardwoods, or if that's too expensive, a synthetic material designed to not be too cold on our toes.
<h5>Auto-magically clean</h5>
Have you seen those coin-operated public restrooms in public cities that actually clean themselves after each use? Why can't we refine this technology and  use it for hotel bathrooms? When the maid comes in, he or she removes all the towels and paper products, closes the bathroom door, and presses a button. Instantly, the whole bathroom is sprayed with disinfecting detergent from a nozzle in the ceiling, rinsed, then dried with high-speed air jets.

Put the bed on hydraulic lifts to make it easy to clean underneath.

Instead of just layering a blanket on top of a sheet, use a large pillow-case-like wrapper for the whole blanket. Design the quilt with drawstrings to make changing the blanket case easy. There is nothing worse than tossing around at night and waking to realize the sheet has slid off the bed and you're now face-to-face with someone else's potential filth.
<h4>Conveniences</h4>
This should be obvious, but: free wi-fi. For everyone. Everywhere.

Provide an easy to use central control panel for things like the alarm clock, the thermostat, maybe even ordering room-service. Every hotel alarm clock has a different interface, leaving guests with no confidence they will actually wake up on time.

Digital thermostats for the showers. It takes me forever to get the temperature just right in an unfamiliar shower. I want to be able to just turn a dial or press a button for the exact temperature I need and let the electronics do the rest.
<h4>And more</h4>
The more I think, the more ideas I come up with. I know most of these will never happen, but it can't hurt to dream, can it?

Feel free to add any ideas using the comment link below.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chickenwingsw.com/scratches/non-software/whats-wrong-with-hotels/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
